Thursday, December 16, 2010

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg named Time Person of the Year 2010


He has already become one of the richest and most generous men on the planet.
Now Mark Zuckerberg has gone one better and become the most influential of them all after being named TIME magazine’s Person of the Year.
The 26-year-old became the second-youngest person ever to receive the award due to the impact of Facebook, the social networking website he founded.Facebook founder
More than 500million people, or one in twelve of the world’s population, are now members to the point where it has ‘merged with the fabric of human life’, TIME’s editors say.

Facebook has such an incredible reach over human beings it now affects us ‘on a species-wide scale,’ they say.

In second place on the list was the Tea Party movement which has tightened its grip on American politics and helped turn the tide against Democrats in the U.S. mid-term elections.

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange was in third due to the US embassy cables which have caused a colossal diplomatic storm, followed by Afghan president Hamid Karzai despite lingering concerns he is ‘vain, incompetent and monumentally corrupt’, as TIME puts it.

Rounding off the winners were all 33 of the Chilean miners whose incredible tale of survival inspired the world.
In their awards, TIME’s editors write: ‘In less than seven years, Zuckerberg wired together a twelfth of humanity into a single network, thereby creating a social entity almost twice as large as the U.S.

‘If Facebook were a country it would be the third largest, behind only China and India. It started out as a lark, a diversion, but it has turned into something real, something that has changed the way human beings relate to one another on a species-wide scale.’



Time Managing Editor Richard Stengel added: ‘It’s something that is transforming the way we live our lives every day. It’s social engineering, changing the way we relate to each other.’

Time’s annual award is decided by the magazine’s editors for the person who ‘for better or for worse, ...has done the most to influence the events of the year’.

Previous winners have included Adolf Hitler in 1938, John F Kennedy in 1961, the computer in 1982 and Barack Obama in 2008.

Aviator Charles Lindbergh was named TIME’s very first Man of the Year back in 1927 when he was only 25, making him the youngest ever to receive the award.


The third-youngest was Queen Elizabeth back in 1952 when she was 26, the year she assumed the throne.
It has already been quite a year for Zuckerberg - according to Forbes magazine his fortune passed £4.4billion making him the 35th richest American, ahead of Apple founder Steve Jobs.

Despite his youth he has also signed up to The Giving Pledge, a commitment by dozens of American billionaires to give away at last 50% of everything they own.

On his Facebook page, Zuckerberg wrote: ‘Being named as TIME Person of the Year is a real honour and recognition of how our little team is building something that hundreds of millions of people want to use to make the world more open and connected.

‘I'm happy to be a part of that.’

In a separate poll readers of TIME had only put him at 10th most important behind Mr Assange in first place, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in second and Lady Gaga in third.
David Cameron had made the short list for Person of the Year but was not among those to make the final cut.

Friday, December 10, 2010

£2billion Facebook giveaway: At just 26, site founder pledges to donate half of his wealth to charity


At the age of 26, he is already one of the richest men in the world.
Now Mark Zuckerberg is to become one of the most generous, after vowing to donate half his £4.4billion fortune to charity.

The Facebook founder has signed The Giving Pledge, a commitment by dozens of American billionaires to give away at least 50 per cent of their wealth.

The brainchild of Microsoft’s Bill Gates and investment guru Warren Buffett, the scheme aims to encourage a wave of philanthropy among the super-rich.


Fifty-seven dollar billionaires have signed up and Zuckerberg, who set up his networking site in 2004, was among the latest 17 to take the pledge yesterday.

Even though most of his cash is still tied up in his company, he is keen to start giving at a younger age than usual.
‘People wait until late in their career to give back. But why wait when there is so much to be done?’ he said.

‘With a generation of younger folks who have thrived on the success of their companies, there is a big opportunity for many of us to give back earlier in our lifetime and see the impact of our philanthropic efforts.’

Mr Zuckerberg has seen his wealth rocket and, according to the latest rankings from Forbes magazine, it has more than trebled this year alone.

At 35th on the Forbes list of richest Americans, he is wealthier than Apple founder Steve Jobs, Star Wars director George Lucas and media tycoon Rupert Murdoch.

He joins AOL co-founder Steve Case, former junk bond trader Michael Milken and Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz as a new entrant to The Giving Pledge.

‘I’m delighted to welcome these 17 families into the Giving Pledge community,’ said Mr Buffett, who is giving away 99 per cent of his £30billion fortune.
‘The Giving Pledge has re-energised people thinking about philanthropy and doing things in philanthropy and I look forward to many more conversations with families who are truly fortunate, and whose generosity can and will change lives.’



Mr Zuckerberg has seen his wealth rocket and, according to the latest rankings from Forbes magazine, it has more than trebled this year alone.
At 35th on the Forbes list of richest Americans, he is wealthier than Apple founder Steve Jobs, Star Wars director George Lucas and media tycoon Rupert Murdoch.

He joins AOL co-founder Steve Case, former junk bond trader Michael Milken and Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz as a new entrant to The Giving Pledge.

‘I’m delighted to welcome these 17 families into the Giving Pledge community,’ said Mr Buffett, who is giving away 99 per cent of his £30billion fortune.

‘The Giving Pledge has re-energised people thinking about philanthropy and doing things in philanthropy and I look forward to many more conversations with families who are truly fortunate, and whose generosity can and will change lives.’

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Billionaire geeks of Google and Facebook go to war.....(What Happen?)


Sergey Brin rolls into work on skates, while colleague Larry Page tinkers with a £77,000 electric sports car. Mark Zuckerberg, meanwhile, waves around a fencing foil when he gets excited.
These are the unconventional billionaires behind the two biggest companies in cyberspace – and they are going to war. Google and Facebook are gearing up for a high-tech battle for our digital lives.
How we search the web, how we shop online and how we communicate in the years ahead will be decided by three geeks with a history of riding roughshod over customers’ privacy.


At 37, Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page are internet veterans. Worth an estimated $15 billion (£9.6 billion) each, they rule an empire that employs 23,000 people and processes a billion search requests every day. 

The pair enjoy vintage wines and even have a Boeing 767 ‘party aircraft' kitted out with hammocks, king- size beds and showers.

One person unlikely to get a boarding pass is baby-faced Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg. The 26-year-old may only be worth a paltry $7 billion (£4.5 billion), but he has a community of 500 million users. His first Facebook business card reads: ‘I’m CEO, bitch!

‘They’re egotistical and young for the amount of money, power and prestige they have,’ says a source. ‘Along with their success comes a certain amount of arrogance.’
Stories of their exploits echo around Silicon Valley in California. They include Zuckerberg turning up late for a meeting with venture capitalists and still wearing his pyjamas. He is also said to have turned down the chance to meet the Queen because ‘I don’t have time for these things’.
All three entrepreneurs cultivate the laid-back, anti-authoritarian image of their student years, when they first formed their companies. Brin and Page earn a symbolic $1 a year from Google – and Brin is still officially on leave from his Stanford University PhD studies.

In the early days of Facebook, Brin would hang out at its scruffy office in Palo Alto, California, sitting on a mattress because there were not enough chairs.

‘The Google guys thought Mark was special and smart from a really early time. They showed him respect,’ says a source. ‘But there has been less interaction between them as the companies have become more competitive. It comes down to ego: they’re all people who really want to win.’

Now that their projects have grown into multinational companies, the founders of Google and Facebook are finding that even cyberspace isn’t big enough for the both of them. Page and Brin are angry that Facebook has made it difficult for users to transfer digital contacts out of Facebook. They’re planning Google’s own, more open social network.
Meanwhile, Zuckerberg is starting a search site with social features, and will soon launch a competitor to Google’s email service.

Google is still the bigger company but Silicon Valley is awash with rumours that many of its software engineers are ‘running through the door’ to join Facebook. And experts fear that online sniping might develop into a fully-fledged cyber war.

‘Page and Brin believe machines are better at making sense of the world’s information than human beings,’ says Sarah Lacy, author of Once You’re Lucky, Twice You’re Good, a book about Silicon Valley.

‘Facebook at its core is a really social company. Zuckerberg has the view that social connections can make daily life more efficient.’
Neither company is a stranger to controversy, particularly when it comes to the privacy issues. For instance, Google keeps records of internet searches for more than a year.

But it was when it started poking its nose into people’s windows that the backlash began. Google Street View is a project to map the world’s cities by taking millions of digital photos from cars at street level. When the site launched in Britain, it showed people entering adult bookshops, a man vomiting in the street and someone being arrested.
In the village of Broughton, near Milton Keynes, residents formed a human barrier to stop a Google Street View car snapping their homes.
For his part, Zuckerberg – or Zuck to his friends – has been in trouble for violating privacy rules ever since creating his first website, Facemash, while at Harvard University.

In 2003, he hacked into Harvard’s computers, downloaded images of female students and invited classmates to rate their looks. Facemash was swiftly shut down by university chiefs and Zuckerberg narrowly escaped expulsion.
Three months later, Facebook was born, and Zuckerberg was on the road to becoming the world’s youngest self-made billionaire.
His days at Harvard were recently given the glossy Hollywood treatment, though his real life is more prosaic. 

‘Mark is very shy, almost socially inept. As you speak to him, he’ll put his hands to his mouth to cover it, start stroking his head and twitch nervously,’ says one Silicon Valley insider.
In the film The Social Network, Zuckerberg is accused by fellow students of stealing the idea for Facebook. He settled the case by handing over tens of millions of dollars and a million Facebook shares.

As the company expanded, its problems with private data grew. In 2007, Facebook launched an advertising service called Beacon, which automatically posted details of people’s online purchases and film rentals to their Facebook page – spoiling surprise gifts and embarrassing thousands.



Then last year, Facebook changed its privacy terms to give it permanent legal ownership of all the words, photos and video clips that users had uploaded. After thousands of protests – and a federal complaint in America – the company finally backed down.
The latest controversy, just weeks ago, involved Facebook transmitting information about tens of millions of people to outside companies. Some then sold the data on to advertisers.

Ironically, Zuckerberg is an intensely private person. ‘He’s never sought the limelight and doesn’t want to be a big celebrity,’ says author Sarah Lacy.
Despite his immense riches, Zuckerberg remains stuck in the lifestyle of a computer science student. He listens to Lady Gaga and U2, loves Gladiator and The Matrix movies, and reads sci-fi books. He rents a modest detached house in Palo Alto, about half a mile from Facebook’s offices, and drives a five-year-old Honda Acura.

He generally gets up at 10am, pulls on a T-shirt, jeans and trainers and strolls to work, eyes glued to his iPhone.
On Friday afternoons, says a source, ‘he and some Facebook buddies – all millionaires themselves – will drive to a student dive bar. There’s sawdust and peanut shells on the floor, and a pitcher of beer costs ten bucks.’

A big night out might involve Zuck and long-time girlfriend Priscilla Chan queuing for a $15 all-you-can-eat buffet at a popular Mexican restaurant.
Google’s Brin also has some strange traits. He and his wife Anne were married in 2007 in his-and-hers swimsuits on Musha Cay, David Copperfield’s private island in the Bahamas. All guests had to swim to an isolated sandbar for the ceremony.

Brin often arrives at conferences in a T-shirt and jeans with holes in them, although since marrying, both Google founders have started to dip into their fortunes. ‘They have pretty modest lifestyles but not as modest as they used to be,’ says author Richard Brandt. ‘They will splurge.’
Brin’s wife recently founded 23andme, a company that offers DNA testing for people interested in their ancestry or genetic health. Brin was shocked to discover he had inherited a mutated gene that increases his chance of developing Parkinson’s disease by a factor of 50.
He has since given $50 million towards finding a cure for the debilitating condition.

Google itself is a philanthropic powerhouse – its charitable arm Google.org has doled out more than $110 million, mainly supporting high-tech projects in clean energy and providing computers for the poor. In September, Zuckerberg gave $100 million to launch a foundation to help public schools in New Jersey.
But Google doesn’t just outgun Facebook when it comes to charity. As well as their Boeing 767, Page and Brin own two corporate aircraft and a Dornier Alpha light attack jet. The 600mph two-seater is kept at a Nasa airfield near Palo Alto where it is used for ‘scientific research’ – and presumably buzzing Facebook’s HQ nearby.
Page and Brin each own ‘at least one’ electric Tesla Roadster sports car. ‘They like them because it suits their taste of being environmentally conscious, they’re really cool and they can pay cash for them,’ says Richard Brandt.

Page is reported to be shopping for one of the first all-electric aircraft.
Charity and environmental work are all part of their famous Don’t Be Evil motto for Google. But a source says they now regret their choice of words: ‘If they had to do that over again, they never would have made that slogan. It’s come back to bite them so many times.’
Zuckerberg, on the other hand, has no motivation beyond building his business. ‘I don’t think Mark is setting out to do anything evil,’ says Sarah Lacy, ‘but he’s never taken the moral high ground.’

The rivalry between Google and Facebook has been boiling for years. Google experimented with a social network at the same time as Facebook launched in 2004.

While Facebook went on to conquer the world, Google’s Orkut, named after a Turkish staff member, fizzled out.
Page and Brin then tried to buy their way into Facebook’s success but in 2007, Zuckerberg accepted a multi-million-dollar investment from Google’s arch-rival, Microsoft, instead.

Now, says a Silicon Valley insider, ‘Page and Brin are scared of Facebook – you can see that in everything Google is doing.’
In 2009, Google launched Wave, a social messaging system that confused more people than it attracted (it is now closed). And earlier this year, Page and Brin mashed up Facebook and Twitter to produce Buzz, a service that adds social features to Google’s popular Gmail site.
However, the only buzz that Buzz generated were angry complaints about the way the site automatically published details of users’ most frequent contacts. Google had to settle a privacy lawsuit against Buzz for $8.5 million. 

‘Brin and Page are just not good at social media,’ says a former associate. Even Brin admits Google chiefs lack the ‘emotional intelligence’ to understand its users.

Both companies see the coming war as a clash of philosophies. Google wants all the information in the world to be freely available – and sponsored by its advertisers. 

Facebook wants to replace Google’s services with recommendations, searches and news tailored to users’interests and sourced from their own friends – but with
Facebook’s commercials.
Google calls Facebook ‘a data dead-end’ and accuses Zuckerberg of ‘trapping his users’ contact information’. Facebook thinks Google’s search page is old-fashioned and secretive. 

‘Facebook is defined by your friends, not by some secret computer algorithm,’ sneers a source.
Facebook is teaming up with Microsoft to add friends’ suggestions to web searches,
Critics and celebrities reveal the mean, moody and magnificent tales that kept them riveted and is about to roll out a new, high-speed messaging service that Zuckerberg hopes will leave Gmail in the dust.

Google,on the other hand, is planning Facebook-busting social layers across its services.
‘Google is generating a ton of cash,’ says financial analyst Rob Enderle. ‘Facebook is wealthy on paper but not so much in raw cash. In a battle between the two today, Facebook is outmatched. But the trend is towards Facebook and away from Google. If that doesn’t change, we could see their positions reversed in five years.’
But whichever company triumphs, the real losers could be us. 

‘Both companies make their money by selling information on their customers,’ says Enderle. ‘That puts their business models in direct conflict with our privacy.’
And if history is anything to go by, Page, Brin and Zuckerberg may well choose dollar signs over doing the right thing.


Monday, December 6, 2010

RIM to Give Indian Government Access to BlackBerry Messenger.

Research In Motion has agreed to provide the Indian government with access to BlackBerry Messenger communications on a case-by-case basis, according to a spokesman for the company in India.
The company will, however, only allow the government "lawful access" to these communications after following due legal process, rather than providing continuous access to the messages, the spokesman said.
The Indian government said on Friday that its security agencies are still not able to intercept and monitor in a readable format the communications made through RIM's Messenger and enterprise services. The government believes that terrorists are increasingly using mobile and online communications to plan attacks.
The government expects to have access to BlackBerry Messenger communications by the end of January, India's Home Secretary G.K. Pillai told The Wall Street Journal.
A resolution to India's demand for access to corporate email on BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES) has however not been found. The Indian government is working on getting access to these communications from RIM's corporate customers, Pillai said.
RIM has not made a significant departure from its earlier stand, despite negotiations with the government, and threats that its service would be discontinued in India if the access was not provided, according to analysts.
Following India's demand for access to communications on RIM's Messenger service and BES, RIM said in a customer update on Aug. 12 that it assures its customers that it genuinely tries to be as cooperative as possible with governments in the spirit of supporting legal and national security requirements, while also preserving the lawful needs of citizens and corporations. It maintains a consistent global standard for lawful access requirements that does not include special deals for specific countries, it added.
RIM however insisted that any capabilities it provides to carriers for lawful access purposes be limited to the strict context of lawful access and national security requirements as governed by the country's judicial oversight and rules of law. The carriers' capabilities must be technology and vendor neutral, allowing no greater access to BlackBerry consumer services than the carriers and regulators already impose on RIM's competitors and other similar communications technology companies, it added.
The company however said that it would not be in a position to provide access to communications on BES, as its security architecture is the same around the world and RIM truly has no ability to provide its customers' encryption keys.
RIM has maintained throughout the dispute over access with India and some other countries that it does not possess a "master key" nor does any "back door" exist in the system that would allow RIM or any third party to gain access to encrypted corporate information on the BES.
If the government is satisfied with access to BES communications through customers, RIM is spared any criticism that it has provided access to the Indian government to its BES, which it promotes as a highly secure service.
Unlike BES which carries information that is encrypted, communications on Messenger are merely scrambled and compressed, according to informed sources. It is possible for RIM or operators to provide these communications in a readable format to government agencies.